To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25085
25084  |  25086
Subject: 
Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:31:48 GMT
Viewed: 
2222 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton wrote:
   Hence, if you were asked to state your opinion as to whether or not a supernatural force existed, you would probably say ‘no’, versus a “true agnostic” who would probably have phenomenal difficulty answering the question.

I don’t see why a true agnostic would have any problems with answering that. It’s the next question that’s the problem (What do you mean you don’t know?).



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
 
(...) What's wrong with "agnostic"? (...) This sounds closer to atheism-- IE you believe in not-the-Christian-god. In my experience with agnostics, they often reject one (or multiple) religions, but are 'undecided' about the rest: "I don't know what (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

200 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR