To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25080
25079  |  25081
Subject: 
Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:22:02 GMT
Viewed: 
2423 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
Okay, okay, I'll buy that.  But in casual conversation and in debates in
general, can you give me a term to use that will be as readily understood
as "atheist?"

What's wrong with "agnostic"?

I dislike that term because it's often seen as too wishy-washy, or a way to
hedge one's bet.  It can also carry a connotation of undecidedness, due not
to a lack of evidence but a lack of conclusion.  Additionally, if you say
"I'm an agnostic" to 100 people on the street, I'd guess that better than 90
of them would understand you to mean "I haven't made a decision re: which
religion is right for me, but I think that one of them is."

I definitely agree-- to be agnostic is really to be undecided. And if you really
simply "don't believe in God", but *would* if given sufficient reason, then I'd
say agnostic matches pretty well.

Not the way I understand what an agnostic is.  An agnostic holds that the
ultimate truth about God existing or not existing is not knowable.  That's not
undecided, though many undecided people misuse the term "agnostic" to describe
themselves.  An agnostic is holding a firm position, undecided people aren't
(contrast 1) You can't prove to me that God does or does not exists, with 2)
Maybe God exists, maybe he doesn't, Idunno).  Describing an agnostic as
"undecided" is like calling a scientist undecided about the theory of relativity
because he can change his conviction based on later evidence.

For the sake of a disclaimer I should probably underscore that my use of
"undecided" in this context was to address a popular connotation of the word
agnostic, rather than a literal denotation.

Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
 
(...) You mean that you understand the correct and incorrect usage but are willfully contributing to the further incorrect usage? ;-) 00>Bruce<01 (20 years ago, 26-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
 
(...) Not the way I understand what an agnostic is. An agnostic holds that the ultimate truth about God existing or not existing is not knowable. That's not undecided, though many undecided people misuse the term "agnostic" to describe themselves. (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

200 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR