Debate : 25054


Off-Topic / Debate / 25054	25053 \| 25055

Subject:	Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:51:20 GMT
Viewed:	1666 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:

As much as the quote is great out of context, it looks pretty clear that that’s not what’s intended.

I don’t get it; am I missing something obvious? What makes the “ten virgins” “bridesmaids for the bride”?

Whoa! Girl-on-girl-on-girl-on-girl-on-girl-on-girl-on-girl-on-girl-on-girl-on-girl-on-girl action, straight from the pages. I’ll have to reread this book after all.

Dave!

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
(...) Blush I'll have another go at that: I don't get it; am I missing something obvious? What makes the "ten virgins" "bridesmaids for the bridegroom"? Scott A (20 years ago, 23-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
(...) I don't get it; am I missing something obvious? What makes the "ten virgins" "bridesmaids for the bride"? Scott A (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

200 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search