To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25048
25047  |  25049
Subject: 
Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:47:59 GMT
Viewed: 
1764 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Laswell wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
   Sorry, why should he shut up about it?

Not getting arrested seems like a good start. Also, breaking the law as a means of trying to have it repealed tends to turn people against you on the grounds that you’re one of “those” criminals instead of “us” law-abiding citizens). Protest it all you want, as long as you don’t go around shouting about how you’re flouting it. The willingness to be arrested in civil protest is admirable, but you can lose the moral high ground when you actively disobey the laws you’re protesting. It worked for Rosa Parks, but it’s backfiring on this guy.

So, “don’t ask, don’t tell”? “Ya I smoked pot but I didn’t inhale”? That sort of thing? Is that the moral creed you espouse? Further, was Rosa Parks right or wrong? How do you feel about civil disobedience as an instrument of change? How about economic boycotts? (what actually brought down segregated buses)

  
   If it’s against the law and the law is worth enforceing, enforce it. If it’s not worth enforcing, get rid of the law.

The law against polygamy is such a law. Not worth enforcing.

There are a lot of laws that aren’t worth enforcing depending on the situation. If you park 15” away from the curb, you’re breaking the law, but it’s not worth making prosecuting you over it. If you park 15’ away from the curb, however, the law is there so they can go after you.

So marrying 2 wives (15” away from the curb) is OK but marrying 20 (15 feet from the curb) isn’t? I’m not seeing the analogy, sorry.

Further, is it true that you support the notion of having laws just so it’s convenient for the police to harass you, so that they have some excuse, regardless of whether it makes sense or not?

   Very few police will pull you over for going 1mph over the speed limit, and they would get hopelessly bogged down if they stopped everyone who does, but you’ve got to set a limit somewhere or you’re left either having people rocketing past houses and schools at 90mph or having an abiguous definition of “too fast” where police can legally decide that it’s okay for one person to drive 50mph, but someone else could be breaking the law at 15mph.

Reasonable and prudent speed seemed to be working OK for Montana.

   It turns out that it’s not so much that polygamy isn’t worth enforcing, but that it’s very hard to prosecute if you’re quiet about it.

That’s as may be but I’ve always stated that I think if you don’t believe in a law, show some backbone and say so, don’t sneak around.

   Polygamous husbands only marry one wife on paper, so the only way to prove that they’re lying about all the “single” women they live with is to invade their privacy. They know it’s happening, but that’s not good enough in court. Anyways, if you want to read some disturbing side-effects of polygamy as it exists in Utah, take a peek at this. Try to explain how beating a 16-year-old girl because she refuses to become her own uncle’s 15th wife is an acceptable side-effect of polygamy.

Na, I won’t. That’s a straw dog as far as what I’ve said here, because I’ve never been in favor of coercion when it comes to setting up contracts. I’m not seeing informed consent in that case, are you?

I mean, at least
   Islam restricts you to four wives and requires that you be able to financially support them and all of their children, instead of letting them end up with 50-100 person inbred families that only survive by having all the 2+ wives illegally file for welfare as “single-parent families”.

That sounds like an argument against welfare, not an argument against polygamy.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
 
(...) No, I just think it's brainlessly stupid to walk around crowing about how you're committing some crime. There's a difference between being willing to be arrested and actively campaigning for it. (...) From what she's said, she was just tired. (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
 
(...) Not getting arrested seems like a good start. Also, breaking the law as a means of trying to have it repealed tends to turn people against you on the grounds that you're one of "those" criminals instead of "us" law-abiding citizens). Protest (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

200 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR