 | | Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | (...) Sorry, why should he shut up about it? If it's against the law and the law is worth enforceing, enforce it. If it's not worth enforcing, get rid of the law. The law against polygamy is such a law. Not worth enforcing. (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution —David Laswell
| | | | | (...) Not getting arrested seems like a good start. Also, breaking the law as a means of trying to have it repealed tends to turn people against you on the grounds that you're one of "those" criminals instead of "us" law-abiding citizens). Protest (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) So, "don't ask, don't tell"? "Ya I smoked pot but I didn't inhale"? That sort of thing? Is that the moral creed you espouse? Further, was Rosa Parks right or wrong? How do you feel about civil disobedience as an instrument of change? How about (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution —David Laswell
| | | | | (...) No, I just think it's brainlessly stupid to walk around crowing about how you're committing some crime. There's a difference between being willing to be arrested and actively campaigning for it. (...) From what she's said, she was just tired. (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | |
