Subject:
|
Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:18:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1488 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
As far as the Church is concerned, the state doesn’t enter in to it.
|
As far as the state is concerned, the church doesn’t, but the church does
require itself to abide by the laws of the land. If the US government says gays
can get married, it doesn’t mean that the church would have to perform or even
recognize such marriages. It means they can’t prevent them from happening, just
like the Catholic church can’t prevent you from getting a basic divorce and then
marrying someone else, even though, in their eyes, you’re still married to your
first wife unless you got an anullment.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
| (...) How many persons? (...) So are public restrooms. Are you against separating those? (...) For what possible reason? That is downright strange. (...) Well, that "church" has some issues. (...) lol "evolution of society"? Are you so sure our (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
200 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
