Subject:
|
Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:24:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1415 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton wrote:
<snip>
>
> (Dave #4 to stick his nose in the debate)
And the scary bit is that, from what I've read, all Dave's seem to be on the
same page regarding this issue, and these Dave's come from widely divergent
backgrounds.
Wow!
Dave K
-go Daves go! Maybe we should make shirts?
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
| (...) Actually, I don't believe I've stated my opinion on whether gays should be allowed to marry, just on who should be able to say whether they can or can't (not the church, and not the federal government, because the US Constitution relegates (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
| (...) So your point is that the state has a vested interest in NOT recognizing marriages? Why? I thought your point (in a past debate) was that somehow gay marriage negatively affected the American family, which was the foundation of society (though (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
200 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
