Subject:
|
Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:18:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1734 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Laswell wrote:
|
which would mean that the only Canadian citizens that would be
eligible until 35 years after Canadas theoretical annexation would be those
born with multi-national citizenship between Canada and the US (and they
could be eligible anyways, as long as they met the other requirements).
|
The US doesnt recognize dual citizenship. Its a bit of a scam because they do
sort of look the other way, but it is possible for the US to retroactively
negate your citizenship if they find that you have also claimed Canadian (or
any) citizenship in addition. A friend of mine bears dual citizenship between
the two and has thoroughly researched these possibilities.
Chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: | | Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
| (...) Some of my friends introduced me to a family that they met after moving to NYC, where the mother is Canadian, the father is from New Zealand, and the kids were both born in the US, thus affording both kids triple-citizenship...until they turn (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
| (...) That's a good question. The closest precedent I could think of is that if you weren't a natural born citizen, you could still be eligible by being a citizen of the US before the constitution was adopted, but I remember reading that that was (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
218 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|