 | | Re: Geography (was: We'll take in your poor....) —David Laswell
|
| | | (...) Last I checked, it's faster to fly west than east, since you'd be flying into the planetary rotation instead of overtaking it. Also, you can't judge the size of a country very accurately by board-to-debark times, since many airlines pad those (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Geography (was: We'll take in your poor....) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | "Purple Dave" <purpledave@maskofdestiny.com> wrote in message news:I0rBKu.1C9r@lugnet.com... (...) into (...) Flying against the planetary rotation might get you somewhere, I'm not sure how all the dynamics work. What I do know is that in the (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Geography (was: We'll take in your poor....) —David Laswell
|
| | | | | | (...) Basic physics says that if you spin the world in one direction, the air will (generally) spin in the other direction (counter-rotation, equal/opposite reaction and such), which should carry you even faster into the rotation and fight you even (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Geography (was: We'll take in your poor....) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | (...) Last I remember of Halley, Hadley and Coriolis that's not how it works, but it's been quite some time since I last looked at that kind of thing. The basic physics as I remember the model is that the heated air around the equator rises (the (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Geography (was: We'll take in your poor....) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Your explanation of hot air movement and how it affects weather and climate matches my memory of the facts a lot better than the previous hot air explanation did. Thanks for posting that! (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Geography (was: We'll take in your poor....) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Does this apply to driving, as well? If so, I may have found a new excuse for being late to work. But a more serious question: How big a factor *is* planetary rotation vis a vis commercial jet travel? I would have thought that, because flights (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Geography (was: We'll take in your poor....) —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | (...) I think the issue is the jet stream. It moves eastward somewhat faster than the ground, so going east you have a tailwind, and going west you have a headwind. Unfortunately for you, the mountains in PA aren't high enough for this to make you (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Geography (was: We'll take in your poor....) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) I'll buy that, except that the original claim seemed to be that the rotation itself was the factor, not the jetstream. Admittedly, I may have misunderstood the framing of the problem: perhaps the question of east/west travel already assumed (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Geography (was: We'll take in your poor....) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) I must admit I have never checked, so I can't even say "last I checked", but since Long Jumpers don't slaver at setting world records on a west facing runway let me be the first official doubter. Going east helps getting into orbit since that (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
