Subject:
|
Re: We'll take in your poor, your homeless, your oppressed...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Jul 2004 19:50:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1245 times
|
| |
|
|
These are LMF answers, mind you... not mine, which are rather muddier
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> > The Macho Libertarian Flash(tm) answer is that there is NO justification, short
> > of actually being invaded by another sovereignty and needing to repel the
> > attack, that justifies attack on another sovereign country.
>
> I'm curious--under the Flash(tm) philosophy, what happens if one sovereign
> nation invades and subjugates a second nation, thereby imposing the sovereignty
> of the invader over the invaded?
Armed conflict happens, presumably.
> What kind of action can be taken in response,
> since the invader could simply assert that the invaded nation is now part of it.
> In other words, who gets to decide which country's sovereignty is valid,
The citizens of the invaded country. As always, just as if they were considering
secession peacefully.
> and
> what's to prevent one nation from annexing another,
The Second Amendment should help slow down invasions considerably, properly
applied.
> if that second nation can't
> repel the annexation? In what forum can the invaded nation plead its case?
The case can be pled in the court of world public opinion when the Valiant
Resistance(tm) seeks volunteers and cash (from private citizens, not
governments, mind you) to help overthrow the oppressor.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
120 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
