To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 2468
2467  |  2469
Subject: 
Re: Motive vs Action (was Re: Blue Hopper Car Mania...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 11 Nov 1999 11:55:43 GMT
Viewed: 
1236 times
  
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999 06:08:59 GMT, "James Brown"
<galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jasper Janssen writes:
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999 17:21:18 GMT, "James Brown"
<galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote:

Neither you nor I are capable of judging motive.  We don't know why Fred ran
over Sam, or why Dave ran over Paul.  The only people who know that are Fred
and Dave, respectively.  All that we can do is judge the action.  Actions are
                                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

observable, and judgable, intent is not. •    ^^^^^^^^^^

Explain how "stepping on the accelerator to speed up" and "driving
along, without stopping" are the same. Discuss this further.

??
They aren't.  How is that relevant?

So please explain how they should be punished the same, since this is
what we were talking about, and there are observable differences in
actions.

Jasper



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Motive vs Action (was Re: Blue Hopper Car Mania...)
 
(...) ?? They aren't. How is that relevant? James (URL) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

178 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR