Debate : 2454


Off-Topic / Debate / 2454	2453 \| 2455

Subject:	Re: Motive vs Action (was Re: Blue Hopper Car Mania...)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Thu, 11 Nov 1999 01:11:52 GMT
Viewed:	1349 times

On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 19:43:46 GMT, "James Brown" <galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote: > Cop shoots someone who is enacting a crime (observable), which is > predetermined by law as a circumstance where it is permisable, cop doesn't go > to jail. Cop is alone when incident happens, cop goes to jail. Cop is with more than one person who swears he saw the crime committed, cop doesn't go to jail. Cop has a partner who swears same for him, which didn't actually happen. Cop doesn't go to jail. Your turn. Jasper

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Motive vs Action (was Re: Blue Hopper Car Mania...)
(...) I don't get it. If you're intending to debate, please provide reasoning to support your examples. Otherwise, please continue to troll away. James (URL) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Motive vs Action (was Re: Blue Hopper Car Mania...)
(...) Hmm. I don't see that as being intent-driven, but circumstance-driven. It (to me) is a difference between "thou shalt not kill, unless you didn't mean to" and "thou shalt not kill, except under clearly defined circumstances" (...) Ok, to stick (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

178 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search