 | | One world order is a pipe dream (was Re: UN Gets It Right!) —Richard Parsons
|
| | | (...) I love the imprecision of this :-) Perhaps 'it is not possible for the US to pay its dues' - and its not like the US doesn't have buckets of money, so presumably its debt to the world (personified in many ways by the UN) is overwhelmingly (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: One world order is a pipe dream (was Re: UN Gets It Right!) —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Your command of the obvious is impressive. Sorry I didn't snip the "or pay our dues" part; glad you found the "imprecision" amusing. Pettifogging makes boring conversation IMO. For instance if I were to rejoin by saying that your use of "its" (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: One world order is a pipe dream (was Re: UN Gets It Right!) —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | | (...) You could well be right. I don't know who came up with it. I recall being a bit surprised myself the first time I heard it being applied in practice. Since then I have seen it work successfully on a factory floor, in a sales force, and in a (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: One world order is a pipe dream (was Re: UN Gets It Right!) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Seriously, only a thinker could come up with such a strategy. (...) It is also commonly applied in classroom management and even juvenile delinquency rehabilitation. It's an awsomely powerful technique that reinforces the notion that kids will (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
