Subject:
|
Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:40:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
877 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
I’d say Moore is well within his rights here. Did Arthur C. Clarke or
Stanley Kubrick’s estate receive royalties for Leslie Nielsen’s
parodic film? Do you really believe
that a royalty should be paid every time an allusive reference is made?
|
Hmmm, seems this case is different. Perhaps because MM choose it for his
title. I’m sure I’d have a difficult time starting up a department store
chain called “Wall to Wall Mart”, or a toy company called “Lay-Go” There is a
definite connection between similarly titled bodies of work here, and I think
permission should have been granted in this case first.
In general, I believe that royalties should only be paid when someone is
profitting off of another person’s work.
FWIW I think Campbell’s would have had a case against Warhol. Too bad he didn’t
try a posterization of the LEGO logo-- TLC sharks would have had a frenzy (but I
stray off-topic;-)
| |
Bradbury can complain, but that’s too bad for Bradbury.
|
| |
| |
As an aside, are you asserting that Farenheit 9-11 is a satire and parody
and shouldn’t be taken seriously?
|
Of course that’s not what I’m asserting. Why should satire not be taken as
serious social or political commentary?
|
A regretful choice of words on my part. I meant do you believe that MM was
making reference to F451 and satirizing that body of work. Or was MM simply
trying to be clever-- perhaps too clever by half?
JOHN
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote: <snip> (...) Moore has stated numerous times, both in articles I've read and interviews that I've seen-- F451 is the temperature at which paper burns--the book is about supression of literature F9/11 is (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) Well, news programs constantly use punch/pun titles, and no one complains about it (except when the torrent of stupid puns overwhelms the discourse (such as when Trent Lott pined for the days of segregation: "Lott of Trouble," "Lott of (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
