Subject:
|
Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:54:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
901 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
I’d say Moore is well within his rights here. Did Arthur C. Clarke or
Stanley Kubrick’s estate receive royalties for Leslie Nielsen’s
parodic film? Do you really believe
that a royalty should be paid every time an allusive reference is made?
|
Hmmm, seems this case is different. Perhaps because MM choose it for his
title. I’m sure I’d have a difficult time starting up a department store
chain called “Wall to Wall Mart”, or a toy company called “Lay-Go” There is
a definite connection between similarly titled bodies of work here,
|
But isn’t this the difference between Trade Mark and Copyright? The have
different names because they ahve different rules.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) Hmmm, seems this case is different. Perhaps because MM choose it for his title. I'm sure I'd have a difficult time starting up a department store chain called "Wall to Wall Mart", or a toy company called "Lay-Go" There is a definite connection (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
