Subject:
|
Re: Motive vs Action (was Re: Blue Hopper Car Mania...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:58:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1042 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
> James Brown wrote:
> > Neither you nor I are capable of judging motive. We don't know why Fred ran
> > over Sam, or why Dave ran over Paul. The only people who know that are Fred
> > and Dave, respectively. All that we can do is judge the action. Actions • are
> > observable, and judgable, intent is not.
>
> Unfortuanately it seems to me that to have a workable society, we have
> to attempt to judge intent. Without judging intent, either murder is not
> a crime, and we can't punish anyone for being responsible for someone
> elses life ending, or there are a lot of police, military, doctors,
> prison guards, and just plain old citizens who have to be put away for
> life (no death penalty anymore, since that would be murder).
You're making assumptions. What if the penalty for murder was deportation?
Or 5 years of community service? No one says it has to be prison for life.
Also, there's no reason why there can't be 'state-mandated'(1) circumstances
under which murder is sanctioned/pardoned. The most obvious example is the
death penalty.
I see no reason why judging intent is necessary to a workable society.
1: for lack of a better term)
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
178 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
