| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
(snip)
I explained what happened, I admitted fault, and I apologised for it.
If it doesn’t fit the format of the apology you want, or doesn’t fit the facts
as you imagine them to be, tough. Take it or leave it.
|
You called me a liar. All I’m asking is that you either justify that or
apologise. It is that simple; it is a matter of etiquette. This is the last
time I intend to ask.
| |
YOU would be well served to review *this* post
http://news.lugnet.com/admin/terms/?n=438
which, I note, is a direct reply to the post you cited.
Internalise it.
I’ve done *far* more than I need to here. Stop baiting me about this.
In fact, stop baiting me about anything at all, as your baiting only proves,
to everyone with any sense that you are low value add, especially when you
carry out vendettas like this.
|
Have you read your posts over the last 48 hours? At one point 7 out of 8
consecutive posts by you were attacks on me. Despite others correcting you,
and me suggesting both directly (on .debate) and indirectly (with e-mails to you
and Todd) that you should stop, you feel obliged to continue.
I just can’t figure what has wound you up so much over the last 48 hours?(1) If
you are feeling stressed in your private life, please do not vent it on me. I
simply do not see why I (or anyone else) should have to put up with this level
of abuse.
Scott A
(1) Can anyone else?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: What about the first?
|
| (...) This is the point where debating loses its 'joy' for me. Can we please leave the 'directed at specific individuals' and the 'could be misconstrued but I'll take it in the worst posible way' attacks out of o-t.d (though I'm sure someone'll dig (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
