To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23823
23822  |  23824
Subject: 
Re: Are you being secured? (or ...TSA? no: TIA! )
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:38:03 GMT
Viewed: 
303 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
The Transportation Security Adminstration may be misnamed... there's an "in"
missing, as in "INsecurity"

http://tzaddik.us/lilpoh/archives/000789.html
http://reason.com/0308/fe.bd.suspected.shtml
http://www.nationalreview.com/dunphy/dunphy200401070913.asp
http://www.reason.com/hitandrun/003874.shtml#003874

and there's a great article in the Feb issue of Reason as well.

Here's another one

http://www.cnn.com/2004/TRAVEL/04/22/airport.security.ap/index.html
Even the TSA's own internal investigator doesn't think they're doing a good job
at securing things. I'll give them this, they do a great job of hassling people
for no good reason though.



Message is in Reply To:
  Are you being secured? (or ...TSA? no: TIA! )
 
The Transportation Security Adminstration may be misnamed... there's an "in" missing, as in "INsecurity" (URL) there's a great article in the Feb issue of Reason as well. (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

9 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR