To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23107
23106  |  23108
Subject: 
Mildly unrelated: LFB runs afoul of Homeland Security
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:22:44 GMT
Viewed: 
1623 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > The Transportation Security Adminstration may be misnamed... there's an "in"
> > missing, as in "INsecurity"
> > 
> > http://tzaddik.us/lilpoh/archives/000789.html
> > http://reason.com/0308/fe.bd.suspected.shtml
> > http://www.nationalreview.com/dunphy/dunphy200401070913.asp
> > http://www.reason.com/hitandrun/003874.shtml#003874
> > 
> > and there's a great article in the Feb issue of Reason as well.
> 
> Well, it looks like I might have to get fingerprinted when I arrive for BF PDX,
> and I don't like that one bit! Not sure yet - they're still debating whether
> countries that have visa exemptions (incl Aus for stays less than 90 days) will
> also be exempt from such "security measures". And Australia has also decided to
> go the same way as the US and have a digital photo on a chip in passports from
> October. I don't see how thats any more secure than a paper photo, but oh well.

   I got word today that Homeland Security is temporarily (they say)
   impounding my belongings coming from South Africa--almost all books
   and papers, with a few other personal effects (clothing) for a CET
   or "Contraband Examination Team" search.  This is going to hold up
   my belongings for perhaps another month, which has me very angry
   because now I will have to pay almost $1000 in addition to the shipping
   fees I am already paying.  It turns out that's what Homeland Security
   does--they actually charge *you* for the privilege of having them
   rummage through your carefully packed things and potentially damage
   or confiscate your books and papers.  On, and if that's not enough,
   I will have to return from the UK to accept the shipment in February.
   That's another $500 or more.  So where's all the tax money going, if
   consignees are being made to pay anyways?

   There is nothing that I can imagine would possibly have looked like
   contraband in my papers.  I am at a loss as to what they're looking
   for, or why I have been singled out for this honor.  I was working
   under a State Dept grant, but I was not permitted to send these by
   consular mail, so still I wait.

   So the things I sent in October are still on their way, and may not
   arrive here in good shape or at all once Homeland Security is through
   with them.  I feel safer already!  Thanks, Mr. Ridge!  Oh well, at
   least I haven't been put on a "no-fly" list (yet) as a dangerous
   academic, as has happened to two people I know already.

   Sorry, I'm just upset and seething, and need to vent.

   best

   LFB



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Are you being secured? (or ...TSA? no: TIA! )
 
(...) Well, it looks like I might have to get fingerprinted when I arrive for BF PDX, and I don't like that one bit! Not sure yet - they're still debating whether countries that have visa exemptions (incl Aus for stays less than 90 days) will also (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

9 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR