|
|
 | | Re: Marriage (was: Re: Yet another push for thoughtful legislation from Tennessee)
|
| (...) Yes but not necessarily relevant. (...) No. It's not at all obvious that is true. You'd have to prove it. But don't bother, because even if it were true, what of it? Marriage != Raising Children Ideal != Only Not Ideal != Should be Forbidden (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Yet another push for thoughtful legislation from Tennessee
|
| (...) So, you are saying that those that can't stand racists aren't as bad as the actual racists, they are worse. As I said, stupid or self-serving. (...) It is the justification of racism that I am trying to understand (well, I do, it is a game to (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Marriage (was: Re: Yet another push for thoughtful legislation from Tennessee)
|
| (...) Don't ask, don't tell;-) But seriously, privacy issues put that tack in irons. (...) If you want to argue that men and women are basically the same, bring it on;-D (...) Specious. You are comparing apples and oranges. Of course I'd never (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Partial transcript of pretty much every interview with Condoleezza Rice
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote: (snip) lol IOW, She's got what it takes to be POTUS and will give HRC a run for her money in 2008:-) JOHN (22 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Marriage (was: Re: Yet another push for thoughtful legislation from Tennessee)
|
| (...) I don't think it's so obvious, honestly. If the fundamental criterion for legal marriage is the possibility of childbirth, then non-fertile couples must not be allowed to wed. Similarly, if a wife and husband try unsuccessfully to conceive, (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
