|
|
 | | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) That's my amazing prose, of course. (...) I don't know that it's two steps back. I can accept that Luke, Matthew, John, and Mark are separate authors of the Gospels, just as I accept that, say, HP Lovecraft and August Derleth are separate (...) (22 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Terrorists hate freedom (was Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles)
|
| (...) I don't have time for your endless tangentalizing-- as if I am obligated to comment on every new topic you toss out in the form of a 6 word question. JOHN (22 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) I didn't say that I thought they were right, or wrong, just that I was amazed at your example. (...) Freudian equivalent of a banana peel? (...) So, within the universe of the Bible, Luke, Matthew, John, and Mark are sufficiently separate (...) (22 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Terrorists hate freedom (was Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles)
|
| (...) Show me how that analogy is relevant. (...) Get a dictionary, and see what "condone" actually means. Then look up "cluster bomb"... a weapon of indiscriminate destruction. You are a (...) Did I say civilians were targets at any point? (...) (...) (22 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) It is not me that is making the claim. (...) Hardly a credible objective viewpoint! (URL) About> the same pet group: "Some U.S. officials see Iran as a target for regime change and have suggested using the Mujahedin-e Khalq as a vehicle for (...) (22 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
