 | | Bush on Nucular Non-proliferation —Richard Parsons
|
| | | Dudes, Heard chunks of his broadcast address on this today (complete with the audio test tones playing over the first ten minutes). There is a summary of it (URL) here>. It would be a lot easier to take him seriously if he could say the word (...) (21 years ago, 11-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Bush on Nucular Non-proliferation —David Laswell
|
| | | | | (...) I've heard it said that his choppy speech actually makes him more popular. Yeah, sure he gets teased mercilessly by people with a well-refined vocabulary, but that's a relatively small portion of the US population. The rest are in the same (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Americans on the word 'nucular' (was Re: Bush on Nucular Non-proliferation) —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | | | (...) I don't know that I'd tease him mercilessly about it, but it just seems, well, incongruous (a word I shouldn't be using in chatting with the majority of the American population perhaps ;-). Can it be true that its a relatively small proportion (...) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Yurpeans [Re: Bush on Nucular Non-proliferation] —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | This one from the past came to mind: (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
