Subject:
|
Bush on Nucular Non-proliferation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:26:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
321 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Dudes,
Heard chunks of his broadcast address on this today (complete with the audio
test tones playing over the first ten minutes). There is a summary of it
here. It would be a lot
easier to take him seriously if he could say the word nuclear.
Why is it that he cant learn the word?
Richard
Still baldly going...
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Bush on Nucular Non-proliferation
|
| (...) I've heard it said that his choppy speech actually makes him more popular. Yeah, sure he gets teased mercilessly by people with a well-refined vocabulary, but that's a relatively small portion of the US population. The rest are in the same (...) (20 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
4 Messages in This Thread: ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Bush on Nucular Non-proliferation -David Laswell (12-Feb-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Americans on the word 'nucular' (was Re: Bush on Nucular Non-proliferation) -Richard Parsons (13-Feb-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Yurpeans [Re: Bush on Nucular Non-proliferation] -Scott Arthur (12-Feb-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|