 | | Re: This is where I actually want a gun —John Neal
|
| | | (...) HA, don't let the Libs hear you say that;-) (...) But herein lies the rub. Does the punishment fit the crime? A 3 time drug abuser can get about the same length sentence (depending upon the ages of the criminals-- hey, life is only so long). (...) (20 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: This is where I actually want a gun —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | (...) Why? I would have thought all you Cons (of one ilk or another) stuck together anyway. ;-) -->Bruce<-- (20 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: This is where I actually want a gun —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Hey, keep those puns in specified areas! (good one:-) JOHN (20 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: This is where I actually want a gun —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) You're right, it's not. A 3 time drug "abuser" hasn't necessarily committed any actual crime at all, so shouldn't be in jail for his/her "crime". I'm glad to see you've decided to come to the side of the angels and oppose the war on drugs, at (...) (20 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: This is where I actually want a gun —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) money, (...) their (...) work? (...) Hmm, I might still let them have slop... I would offer a variety of incentives. I don't see a problem with prisoners who are on their way to rehabilitation having access to TV and such. In fact, if they are (...) (20 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
