|
|
 | | Re: Corporal punishment (was rah rah, canada!
|
| (...) Honestly considering tantrums is a somewhat humbling experience for parents. You can pretty explicitly track the cause of the tantrum to failure to act on the part of the parents. I've been there and done that. It's been my fault. It might be (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) So we pass laws to lower the hemline back to ankles? There should be a difference between sex and, well, not sex. And this issue of toplessness falls on the non-sex side, or at least it should, for there are societies today that have no (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) Please. "Naked"??? He wore shoes and socks! Give me a real Naked Trekker, not this pitiful pretender! JOHN (22 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) Okay, here goes. First, WRT to religion, I get my values and morals from my religion and they will be reflected in my answer, but they are mine. It is never my intention to force my religion on somebody else. But because I derive my values (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) Ugh! Can we please keep the conversation to humans? Chris ;-) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
