Subject:
|
Re: Missing the point about labor
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:05:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
254 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> NR showing protectionist stripes?
>
> http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/krikorian200401070923.asp
>
> Mr. Krikorian may be right that access to cheap labor means less labor saving
> innovation, but (apparently not being a free trader) he misses the point.
> Employers should have the choice of whether to use cheap labor or labor saving
> devices in their drive to improve efficiency.
>
> Restricting access to labor, as Krikorian advocates (indirectly) is just as much
> a restraint of trade as laws prohibiting introduction of labor saving devices
> are. It's just a different kind of restraint.
>
> I won't go so far as to say I unreservedly favor Bush II's program regarding
> immigrant workers, because I favor no restrictions on immigration whatever,
> subject only to the proviso that it is on a "make your own way or starve" basis.
I doubt a bunch of starving immigrants will do much for crime statistics.
Scott A
> The Bush program seems to add another layer of regulation and red tape to an
> already overregulated system.
>
> Why is it that new programs almost always seem to do this? They never replace
> regulations, only add special cases and exemptions to them.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Missing the point about labor
|
| NR showing protectionist stripes? (URL) Krikorian may be right that access to cheap labor means less labor saving innovation, but (apparently not being a free trader) he misses the point. Employers should have the choice of whether to use cheap (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
