Subject:
|
SHOCK: Iraq WMD threat 'misrepresented' by Bush!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:32:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
146 times
|
| |
|
|
From the BBC:
“The Carnegie Endowment said it had studied hundreds of documents and
interviewed dozens of specialists for its report WMD: Evidence and Implications.
The report says there was “no convincing evidence” that Iraq had reconstituted
its nuclear programme. There was no evidence to support the claim that Iraq
would have transferred WMD to al-Qaeda and much evidence to counter it. The
report says it was unlikely Iraq could have destroyed, hidden or moved large
amounts of chemical and biological weapons without the United States detecting
some sign of activity.”
No surprise to some of us I suppose!
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
2 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
