|
|
 | | Hallowed by his name
|
| Particularly objectionable to Reagan's sycophants was (URL) CBS's> choice not to include the scene in which the sacrosanct former President multiplied the loaves and fishes, nor the part in which he created the world in six days. No doubt The (...) (22 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Why Shrub is a Radical, or Don't Listen to Me -- Pay Attention to What Bush Sr. Has Done...
|
| For those that think the neo-con takeover is just business as usual, I give you this opinion piece: BUSH SR. SENDS NOT-SO-SUBTLE MESSAGE WITH AWARD TO KENNEDY (URL) When it was announced (with amazingly little fanfare) that the pugnaciously (...) (22 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Detroit's woes, unaddressed by the Dems
|
| (...) Yes, of course they do. And that's not always a bad thing except when it gets kinda rabidly slanted a particular way. I try to post stuff that is at least semi-objective from a huge variety of sources. Sure, some of it is just (...) (22 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Detroit's woes, unaddressed by the Dems
|
| (...) I would tend to think that this line of argument can be used against many of the sources (both factual and cultural) cited here on a regular basis... NPR, the NYT, Fox, The Economist, The Guardian, DemocraticUnderground etc, all have (...) (22 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Detroit's woes, unaddressed by the Dems
|
| (...) Although bias should not automatically be assumed, a media source that has demonstrated unrelenting bias (such as Ann Coulter or Michael Moore) then it is not unreasonable to suspect bias in any given piece. That's not to say that such bias (...) (22 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
