 | | Re: WARNING, VERY DISTURBING IMAGES (was Re: Holy crap! ) —David Koudys
| | | | (...) Well, the armed forces, the police, the reserves... any group that's "well regulated". Again I'd like any logical justification of private ownership of guns and how that would prevent this sort of thing. Oh wait, you own your guns and Iraq (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: WARNING, VERY DISTURBING IMAGES (was Re: Holy crap! ) —Mike Petrucelli
| | | | | (...) I shudder to think how bad it would be without our final check. Besides you are still agruing for an untested, let alone an unproven, concept. There is still no evidence supporting your claims that Democracy or Republics can exist without an (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: WARNING, VERY DISTURBING IMAGES (was Re: Holy crap! ) —David Koudys
| | | | | (...) Canada. Sure we may have people who have guns in the house--my uncle still has his shotgun from his hunting days--but it's not mandated under law. We have no "2nd" or comparable clause thereof. I haven't heard a Canadian say "I have my gun for (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | |
