To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 22493
22492  |  22494
Subject: 
Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:48:46 GMT
Viewed: 
1154 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:

<snip>


The very fact of one's statement, assuming that the statement is not false,
implies that all of this "I believe that I believe" stuff has been subsumed into
the actual statement uttered.  You can unpack it, but only if you've got
eternity to spend on it, and I don't believe that I do.

Wow, you write that word out so much it appears to lose all meaning ;)

And it starts to look like it's spelled incorrectly, no matter how many times
you check it.

     Dave!

On that we both agree!

:)

And the rest nicely stated.

Dave K



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
(...) Right, but by that same token, consider this: In statement A, the conditional thing that does or does not exist is God. In statement B, the conditional thing that does or does not exist is belief. (...) I disagree, believe it or not! 8^) I (...) (21 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR