| |
In lugnet.trains, Tony Alexander wrote:
> All I wanted to do was point out that I thought Gregory Overkamp wasn't
> being treated with the respect that I thought was inherent in this community.
> He posted something I thought directly related to trains in the .trains
> newsgroup, and was essentially told that he didn't belong because he's not
> realistic enough.
Were we reading the same post? I didn't see that in Larry's response at all.
We've had "fantasy trains" in .trains before and they were well received. It is
very easy to get the wrong impression from one line of text.
> I still think people need to lighten up.
Yes, and that goes for everyone.
> I'm not going to run away or stop posting, I'm not going to stop
> frequenting Lugnet, and I'm not going to stop giving my opinion.
Good! I don't have the time or the hook-up speed to search Brickshelf all the
time and rely on .trains for all the latest news and photos. I hope people
continue to post and remember that there are going to be 1 of 3 things happen:no
response; positive response; or negative response.
Play well,
Lawrence.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
