Subject:
|
No Smoking Gun, No Iminant Threat.... and No Surprise?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:17:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
77 times
|
| |
|
|
No Smoking Gun, No Imminent Threat.... and No Surprise?
My personal view on SH before we bombed him was that:
- He probably did have some form of WoMD.
- He would use them if threatened.
- He did not represent an imminent threat to the region or the world.
It looks like I was wrong on the first point:
‘No surprise’ Iraq WMD
not found
they have not found any stocks of weapons of mass destruction of any kind
The hunt
for weapons of mass destruction yields - nothing
An intensive six-month search of Iraq for weapons of mass destruction has
failed to discover a single trace of an illegal arsenal
...not even a can of fly spray.
So what’s the answer? That’s easy; give the ISG what Blix was not allowed: more
time.
I really do wonder about the costs and benefits of the conflict; OBL must be
laughing his socks off whilst sending out the membership packs...
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
3 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
