 | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) You ask the same question later on, so I'll answer it there (...) I'd say, basically, any scheme, in order to be successful, needs to have buyers AND sellers. Right now, for example, SC has lots of sellers but not enough buyers. The window (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Richard Franks
|
| | | | (...) I agree - and I think I answered it in: (URL) I won't waste disk space by repeating myself too much! :) Richard (25 years ago, 14-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) I tell you what - you find some 4558's for retail price at some old store and I'll buy as many as you have at 10% over retail. Better yet, I'll give you a list of parts that I want and the sets they're available in, and I'll gladly pay you 10% (...) (25 years ago, 14-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Richard Franks
|
| | | | (...) Sure - I don't have a problem with that. It'd make a change to make a profit! (...) If I have them and I don't want then then thats fine with me. Richard (25 years ago, 14-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Will Middelaer
|
| | | | (...) Sorry this is a reply to a very old thread, but I ran into it and it disturbed me so much I had to reply. (...) <sarcasm> But realize, that in your system, you are only allowed to want them up to ten percent more than you paid for them. Once (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
