Subject:
|
Re: Voluntary, private discrimination (Was: Disparicies in Sentencing)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Sep 1999 16:14:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3813 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Naji Norder wrote:
> >
> > (I've snipped a lot here and there.)
>
> me too
I TRY to make it shorter. :)
> Agreed. I think constitutional amendments are needed for LARGE issues
> (like giving the vote to previously disenfranchised citizens), or to
> correct procedural oversights (like changing the succession rules of the
> presidency to ensure no possible gap in coverage). It is pretty clear
> that burning the flag (in a safe way, in a place where you are ensuring
> that there will be no pollution and not on public property) is an
> expression of thought, and therefore protected speech.
I agree as well.
> A lot of these right wing hot button issues
Oh, come on, Larry, I am not that bad, am I? ;)
> that amendments are proposed
> for seem ludicrous to me.
Yes, I agree also.
> Allowing school prayer? No way. Separate public schools from private,
> then allow prayer in whatever private schools the owners decide to have.
> But public schools should neither promote, nor denigrate, any particular
> religion.
I agree with the public schools and mandated prayer (not good), having a moment
of silence or whatever is fine with me. I would like to see (If I have children,
or anyone who has children right now) to have a choice to which school they
could go to. (I would send mine to a really good Christian school I know of)
where they can pray all they want. The current system is totally against this,
however. I have to pay extra just for my kids going to a private school, I am
getting charged twice! The public schools seem to try to train most kids into
left-wing tree-hugging environmentalist wackos who can't do anything, like read
or write, and seem to worship diversity as a god in itself! Not for my kids!
> Another ridiculous amendment was the one that started Prohibition. Too
> fine grained an issue to be properly the subject of a constitution.
It was a stupid thing to do, and I am glad it was overturned.
Scott S. - A real right-winger!
--
Scott E. Sanburn
CADD Operator, CADD Systems Administrator
Affiliated Engineers, Inc. Ann Arbor, MI
Work Page:
http://www.aeieng.com/
Home Page:
http://www.geocities.com/~legoguy712/index.html
Lego Page:
http://www.geocities.com/~legoguy712/legoindex.html
“The more people I meet, the more I like my Lego collection.”
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
276 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
