Subject:
|
Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:44:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1338 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Pedro Silva wrote:
| |
Could you clarify what “common law” is? Especially if it is a deliberately
vague concept or not.
|
More on defining the term “common law,” see:
http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law
Hours of reading would result from following the various links. Probably
worth it too!
|
A very interesting link - thank you, Richard. I shall use it for future
reference.
After some really superficial reading, I can now at least pretend to know why
the term “common law” is so... uncommon to me: according to one of the earlier
links, it is mostly used in a context of adversarial system, which is not the
one in use in my country (inquisitorial system, or “Roman-Napoleonic” being our
standard code of laws). If I were a lawyer, I’d know that the Civil Code (read,
“civil law”) is what’s used around here :-)
Oh well - live and learn!...
Pedro
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
