Subject:
|
Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 14:38:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2742 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:
|
Okay, fine -- if your point is that the purpose of a gun is to kill or
destroy a thing, then thats basically an undisputed fact.
That it is the only utility of the gun is a separate matter.
I still think that the guns power for destruction is the very reason some
people are eating venison burritos while still others are quietly sitting
peacefully in their homes. If you want to dispute that, go right ahead. But
you will have to prove to me that a revolution can be fought without
expressly lethal arms.
|
Again with the Jeffersonian speak. I would point out that Jefferson livd
200+ years ago and some of the ideas from that time may not be valid today.
Again (and again and again) it is your national forces thats protecting your
freedom and liberty, not that gun locked up in a closet in your house.
Your gun in your house isnt protecting anyone. Its giving you a false
sense of security and giving a real object for those that steal to take, put
on the black market, and, in the end, kill one of your fellow citizens.
|
Now come on. Pay attention. http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=21343
|
Revolution fought without espressley leathal arms? Well, in tin-pot
dictator type countries, sure, arm the citizens and have your revolution.
|
Please get your facts straight. In tin-pot dictator type countries only the
government and police have guns. That is why they can oppress and enslave their
people.
|
But were not talking about some backward country where the military is
corrupt (and usually has approximately the same armament as the citizens).
Were talking about us here.
|
Exactly we have guns too.
|
And in the in the 21st century, there are those
countries that have risen to the point where guns in the hands of the citizen
is becoming irrelevant and not needed.
|
If you dont mind living without freedom in a tin-pot dictatorship.
|
Its the evolution of society, and
there will be those that cling to antiquated ideas because they dont want
to, or cannot see that times have changed. The power of law, the power of
education, the power of the people are now far superior to the power of the
|
And where exactly do you think the power of the people comes from.
|
|
Powell is over there talking about tank technologies, refusing to address
the issue of whether a tank encased person must at some point leave the tank
and therefore be susceptible to a bullet to the head. Maybe the tank can be
attacked en masse, forcibly opened, and the persons inside killed. And, I am
not myself opposed to the private ownership of some pretty nasty stuff --
stuff that could pierce armor. The invincible military and armaments
argument is Powells straw man. I dont buy it for one second. And sure,
Canada is a great place and all -- but if things were to go south on yall,
I hope Powell would be the first to recall my warning about not giving up
the guns. Gun use is a right and a duty -- talk to the Swiss.
|
For the regulated armed forces. For the properly trained. For those that
are duty sworn to protect and defend. None of which encompasses your gun
in your house. If things start going south on any of us, again its not
the gun in your house, its the USS Abraham Lincoln, and the Nimtz, and
whatever satellites are circling the globe that are going to get our heinies
out of trouble.
|
You still have not addressed the concept of a threat from within and the fact
that several million armed citizens can easily overwhelm the military. Yes it
would be bloody but it would be successful.
|
You talk of rights, you talk of duty, what of your duty to your fellow
citizen who just got shot by a gun stolen from your house?
|
Again I direct you here. http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=21343
|
What happened to
his rights? Your duty is to your country and your fellow citizen. Keeping a
gun in your house does not help either.
|
As Mike has pointed out, where people have lost their right to arms they can
be herded like sheep and put on the train to the death camps. How can such
people resist their armed masters?
And because you dont have an answer to that, for me that ends the
conversation -- Im not saying that I wont participate in it,I am just
saying that I have never heard the point properly disputed.
|
And when it was found that the most poerful person in the *world* was facing
charges, he stepped down from office without one shot being fired, without
one gun to be seen. The power of law is what he followed. He didnt need
someone weilding a gun to make him walk out of that office.
So Nazi Germany before and during WW2 is not the same as, say, the US today.
|
Excuse me? If you honestly belive that could not happen if people had no means
to stop it you are delusional. The US Gun Control Act of 1968 is almost
indentical to the translated Nazi Weapons Law of 1938. That is a matter of
public record.
|
|
And as I have said before, I am living in the U.S. -- where things are
looking pretty weird to me right now. Not terrible, but weird (with special
emphasis).
|
On this at least we agree. Be vigilant. Be pro-active. Be wary. There are
tools at your disposal in todays age which are far superior to the gun.
Start using them.
Your gun in your house will not take the weirdness out of your country.
Ever.
I was going to sign off with that but just that line gots me ta thinkin
(which is never a good thing...) Thats one of the bigger problems right
there--Oh I have my gun, so if things go south I can rise up and join the
ol revolution. Failing to consider that by participating in and helping
society before it goes south is a much better, and more civilized option.
Then again, I forget who Im talking with--the US has always been more
reactive than proactive--like the kid, who, when sleighted, just lashes
out at any convenient target.
Which always brings me back to the other idea--when you grow up, well be
here, waiting for you.
|
You are the one living in fantasy land where the government and police are
uncorruptable. News flash, they are just a human as the rest of us. As such I do
not trust them with being the only ones to have guns.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
161 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|