 | | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | (...) Probably because "'An it harm none, do what thou will" is too pagan for y'all. Besides, the former is part of French jurisprudence. -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...) —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | (...) OK, I have to ask because I really don't get this reply at all: (URL) do you apply that principle to the issue of Abortion. Obviously my opinion is that the freedom of choice is whether or not to have sex and that abortion is a euphemism for (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | (...) I'm okay with idea of abortion as the killing of a living thing, but not as murder. Murder can be defined as "the unlawful killing of another person." I deny that a foetus is a person with rights under the law. The foetus is not independent, (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...) —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | | (...) Interesting, personally I figure after the first month when the cell mass has a discernable heartbeat and human form it should be protected as a baby. (...) It was regarding gun ownership and freedom going hand in hand. It was along the lines (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) Here I am a closet animist and you think I don't know the source of that quote and you think that it is too pagan for me? :-) In any case, it's not the harm, but the immediate impending action that will cause harm that is so specific one can't (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
