To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 21300
21299  |  21301
Subject: 
Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:25:48 GMT
Viewed: 
1444 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
   Yeah, I know, it’s a hypothetical excercise, but why such a bad hypothetical excercise is always trotted out, I don’t know.

Probably because “‘An it harm none, do what thou will” is too pagan for y’all.

Here I am a closet animist and you think I don’t know the source of that quote and you think that it is too pagan for me? :-)

In any case, it’s not the harm, but the immediate impending action that will cause harm that is so specific one can’t wait on it: i.e. it’s still a silly scenario because your example isn’t reasonable (nor did you technically get the scenario right).


-->Bruce<--



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
 
(...) Probably because "'An it harm none, do what thou will" is too pagan for y'all. Besides, the former is part of French jurisprudence. -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR