| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... Richie Dulin
|
| | (...) Good points. I post on off-topic.debate irregularly, but view it often. If o-t.debate wasn't there it wouldn't worry me. However, like driving past a traffic accident, I try to ignore it - but I am constantly drawn back. The views expressed (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... Pedro Silva
|
| | | | (...) There, you've explained how the safety valve works :-) (...) Fun, and instructing. I've learned much from the care many of the debaters put on their research of the topics under discussion - many things of which I'd never even think about, (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... Sean Devolites
|
| | | | | (...) Basically Pedro, your opinion is my opinion in most ways. Now i dont have to type it! yay. Hasta la Vista, Sean (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... Sean Devolites
|
| | | | Well thanks for the definition Richie! I guess I see why some people get angry now... Anyways, thanks for the response, it sums up debate for me! I stick to my points also, so I can see how that is. I know how much people hate being proved wrong, (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) FOCROFLMAO (Falling Off Chair if that part is too obscure - and here I claim not to speak Initial). The rest were pretty good (guilty on a variety of accounts). -->Bruce<-- (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |