 | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | (...) "Little things"? "Sport debates"? Talk about inverted priorities...what are you, 12? -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... —Sean Devolites
|
| | | | | (...) Actually, 14. : ) And you say _I_ have inverted priorities? I mean, I'd so much rather uselessly run my mouth about something I'll make sense in rather than something political and making a fool of myself... Or have I done that already? (...) (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... —Matt Hein
|
| | | | (...) Actually Richard, that was a damned assumptive remark. Like some at .debate argue about everything from politics to lego to religion, there are those out there that would rather argue about affairs revolving around sports, cars and movies. So (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) Hey, he has his opinions and I have my own. If he can encompass discussions of world politics with the words "little things," I think I am allowed to express an opinion on that comment. As has been commented before: don't like what you read in (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... —Matt Hein
|
| | | | (...) While is it true that world politics take far more importance over anything else of the sort, I won't go the the extent to demean those whom veer from that discussion. Well, to each his own, I surmise. (...) Yes, the pressure does compound (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
