 | | Re: Are you in or are you out? —Spencer Nowak
|
| | | (...) Would you rather have those criminals runing the streets? or should they just be executed? (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Are you in or are you out? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) You're right--I live in constant fear that a guy with a nickel-bag of pot is going to smoke near me. And those poverty-level criminals are much more dangerous than wealthier (and, therefore, acquittable) criminals. The racial disparity of the (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Are you in or are you out? —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | Yeah, thank god we have the "edumacation" president now -- all that's gonna change! Spencer is not able to connect the dots like some of the other children in class, he ends up with a page of jumbled lines instead of a picture of duckie he can color (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Are you in or are you out? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Not sure I agree with that, exactly, it's rather a long chain of inferences. (...) So stick to them, Dave! They're sufficient. (21 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
