To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19747
19746  |  19748
Subject: 
Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 15:21:08 GMT
Viewed: 
956 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:

Ok, I was refering to the operation of the Government, not the social changes
that occured between now and then despite the government's best efforts to the
contrary. See maybe we have a slight difference of opinion here. I see the
Government, not as the people who will fix things for us, but the cause of
most of the problems.

   You may freely assert that point, but you must also document it, and you
should also document how things would have been better without government
intervention.  The examples I gave:

the same time period in which civil rights were non-existent, Presidents could
serve an unlimited number of terms, the securities industry was wholly (and
tragically) unregulated, women were all but chained to their stoves, the
military draft was in full effect, the environment was freely polluted by
unmonitored industry, the interstate freeway system didn't exist, poll taxes
were in effect, alcohol was illegal, rural electrical service didn't exist,
and the FDIC hadn't yet come into being?

  are not social changes (with the exception of the women/stoves bit) but
are in fact direct, positive results of government programs.  Social
security, though a favorite target of conservatives, has also been a
tremendously successful program (in terms of its original intent, rather
than its current use).
  If you're going to assert that these are mere social changes that took
place "despite the government's best efforts to the contrary," then you
really need to demonstrate how the government tried to stop these from
occurring, and how they failed to do so.
  Additionally, it's tough for me to respond to your arguments if you don't
cite the post that preceded yours!

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
 
(...) the (...) Which resolved regardless of the the attempts to stop it. (...) So? That is why we have an election. (...) So? Who's fault is it if they lose everything gambling on the securities industry. (...) Also resolved despite efforts to the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
 
Ok, I was refering to the operation of the Government, not the social changes that occured between now and then despite the government's best efforts to the contrary. See maybe we have a slight difference of opinion here. I see the Government, not (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

164 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR