 | | Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This... —Christopher L. Weeks
| | | | (...) Modified hypothetical: Let a = whacky terrorist group run by a psychopath. Let b = nuke-bearing dictatorship run by a guy who likes living the good life and pretty evil, but not plausibly insane. Let c = big country that they both hate. So, a (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This... —Spencer Nowak
| | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:> (...) Not necessarily nukes. they know c would annihilate them for that. however a terrorist group *could* come up with chem or bio weapons themselves, and therefore using them would hurt c (...) (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This... —Richard Marchetti
| | | | | (...) Something we agree on. Given the "problems" with our itelligence, why would you rather err on the side of war? Kill 'em all, let god sort 'em out? Perhaps you can explain it better... -- Hop-Frog (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
