To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19879
19878  |  19880
Subject: 
Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 26 Mar 2003 05:16:15 GMT
Viewed: 
717 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Spencer Nowak writes:
Lastly, there not being a "proven" link means nothing. if our military
intelligence was that good OBL would be long dead and the bay of pigs
invasion would have worked out nicely.

Something we agree on.  Given the "problems" with our itelligence, why would
you rather err on the side of war?

Kill 'em all, let god sort 'em out?

Perhaps you can explain it better...

-- Hop-Frog



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:> (...) Not necessarily nukes. they know c would annihilate them for that. however a terrorist group *could* come up with chem or bio weapons themselves, and therefore using them would hurt c (...) (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

164 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR