To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19739
19738  |  19740
Subject: 
Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 13:47:31 GMT
Viewed: 
598 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Spencer Nowak writes:

Hypothetical Situation:  Let ! = a group of terrorists
                        Let @ = an autocratic country with wmds, built or in
progress. Also, they dont have a single resource anyone would want
                        Let # = a country that the 2 above hate with every
fiber of their being

Now then:  ! and @ are brought together by a common interest-destruction of #
@ gives wmds to !, knowing it is the best way to hurt #
# knows that ! and @ want to destroy # and that they have the means to
atleast hurt #. If you were #, what would you do?

Modified hypothetical:

Let a = whacky terrorist group run by a psychopath.
Let b = nuke-bearing dictatorship run by a guy who likes
        living the good life and pretty evil, but not
        plausibly insane.
Let c = big country that they both hate.

So, a and b would both like to see c crumble...so far we're agreeing.  But, if
b gives a nuke to a that is then used on c, while c is stinging at the insult,
c will utterly eradicate from this Earth all of b.  And everyone knows this.
So, b, much as he might like to see c hurt, will not give the nuke to a.

The truth is, that if Saddam provided Bin Laden with a nuke that was then
detonated in Manhattan, we cleanse the desert with nuclear hellfire and leave
it a glowing ecological disaster for 20,000 years.  It would be an attack of
unprecidented magnitude.  And we would go down in history as monsters, but we
would do it anyway because the capacity for vengence that is within our psyche
would demand it.  Hussein is no fool.

Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:> (...) Not necessarily nukes. they know c would annihilate them for that. however a terrorist group *could* come up with chem or bio weapons themselves, and therefore using them would hurt c (...) (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
 
(...) Hypothetical Situation: Let ! =a group of terrorists Let @ =an autocratic country with wmds, built or in progress. Also, they dont have a single resource anyone would want Let # =a country that the 2 above hate with every fiber of their being (...) (21 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

164 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR