Subject:
|
Re: An interesting find
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 Mar 2003 20:48:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
297 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> > > http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/19/bill.of.rights/index.html
> > >
> > > The funny thing is that the *actual* bill of rights has been missing since
> > > January 20, 2001.
> >
> > Err, it was only 1 of 14 copies commissioned by George Washington, according
> > the to the article.
>
> Err, I think he's referring to the stolen election being the sign that the
> Bill of Rights are done for (missing since inauguration day) in our country.
Got it now. My misteak actually believing Dave! when he said he was over the
election a few posts ago...:-)
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: An interesting find
|
| (...) First of all, fie on you for misuse of Dave! Larry is the clear master of the usage, so I'd advise you to study his stylings. So says Dave! Second of all: i·ro·ny n. pl. i·ro·nies 1. The use of words to express something different from and (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: An interesting find
|
| (...) Err, I think he's referring to the stolen election being the sign that the Bill of Rights are done for (missing since inauguration day) in our country. He's wrong, of course. The Bill of Rights was trampled on way before that. I keep trying to (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
