Debate : 19463


Off-Topic / Debate / 19463	19462 \| 19464

Subject:	Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Wed, 19 Mar 2003 05:13:04 GMT
Viewed:	493 times

> Since abrogating the Clinton administration's signature last year, the Bush > administration has persuaded 24 countries to sign bilateral agreements with > the United States, pledging not to surrender to the court U.S. nationals or > foreigners working under U.S. contract. The U.S. Congress has passed > legislation authorizing the president to take "all means necessary" to free > Americans taken into custody by the court. Does anyone know why? Lets see; no right to fair jury, no right to language translator, no right to legal counsel, and you can be imprisoned in any country the court chooses. This applies to civilians as well as military personel. I don't know, maybe in other countries it is normal to be tried in a court without knowing or understanding why, shipped to China or something, and never be seen again. Here in the USA civilians don't tolerate that kind of crap. For crying out loud a US military court gives someone more rights than the current International Court does. -Mike Petrucelli

Message has 3 Replies:

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) Define "fair jury". (...) That'd be a première, in UN instances... Anyway, why are you complaining? It's not as if the judges were to speak anything other than English among themselves! :-) (...) Please elaborate. What are the guaranties for (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) Ya, you're right. What the US is doing to the terrorism detainees, as you describe above, is shocking and disgusting. Thanks for reminding us. Oh wait, you're talking about the ICC, aren't you? I got confused for a minute (...) It does? Not if (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
Interestingly, none of these objections seem to bother other participating countries, and it didn't bother Clinton any either (last time I checked he was a red blooded american also, and hey at least he showed signs of life) -- it bothers Shrub!!! (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) "International War Crimes Court Is Inaugurated, but Without U.S." (URL) portions: ---...--- Since abrogating the Clinton administration's signature last year, the Bush administration has persuaded 24 countries to sign bilateral agreements with (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

164 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search