 | | Re: Megan's Law, and its implications —Frank Filz
|
| | | (...) Hmm, does that never mean that the parent has an obligation to support the child if the child loses his/her job in a layoff after attaining self sufficiency? How is this modified when rape is involved? How do we hold the rapist responsible for (...) (22 years ago, 18-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Megan's Law, and its implications —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) It's hard for me to think of it as an obligation. I've never met anyone able-bodied who was in a position that precluded them from supporting themselves. Also, wouldn't the parent _want_ to help out? Just like the adult kid would _want_ to be (...) (22 years ago, 18-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Megan's Law, and its implications —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) I agree that in many cases the parent would want to help, and a properly raised kid should want to be productive around the house. (...) Ok, it did seem reasonable that the parental obligation mostly ends when the child attains (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Parental Responsibilites (was: Megan's Law, and its implications) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) My intention is not to give the adoptive parents a way out, but to prevent the natural parents an absolute way out. I believe that the parental responsibility transcends legal fabrications. When you bring a child into the world, you owe that (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Parental Responsibilites (was: Megan's Law, and its implications) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) Ok, I see your point. I guess I'm comfortable with it given that I can't conceive of a situation where the rape victim wouldn't have an opportunity to terminate the pregnancy (ok, there could be situations where somehow the person doesn't (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Parental Responsibilites (was: Megan's Law, and its implications) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | So, have we debated out this topic? I'm getting sick of the pointless debate going on now... Frank (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | [brainstormin’] [was Re: Parental Responsibilites (was: Megan's Law, and its implications)] —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) [brainstormin’] 1. Do think we'd benefit from having more than one debate group? I'm not sure what the best split would be: lugnet.off-topic.deb...nt-affairs lugnet.off-topic.deb...thing-else or lugnet.off-topic.debate.guns (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Parental Responsibilites (was: Megan's Law, and its implications) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) But you're just defining what the parents owe with an absolute dollar value, while I'm not. I think parents owe time and spending power and even a particular style (or one of several, more like) of parenting. But there is no single good that (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Parental Responsibilites (was: Megan's Law, and its implications) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) I guess we're getting into the nitty gritty details of what is owed. I don't think I'm looking for absolutes (in fact I think I want to avoid them). I think part of what I'm looking for is how do we judge (I think we have to have some basis (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Parental Responsibilites (was: Megan's Law, and its implications) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, that's tough. One big problem with this is that the wants of the child will often disagree with the thoughts of society on what should happen. Children, even fairly abused children, usually don't want to be seperated from their parents. (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Parental Responsibilites (was: Megan's Law, and its implications) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) Clearly we must trod the path of taking kids from their parents very carefully. This certainly is an area we need to work on. Perhaps there are ways to provide the kids with some safety net without removing the parents totally, so the kids can (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
