 | | Re: How to decide what art is worth (was Re: Extropianism —Jesse Long
|
| | Christopher Weeks <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:37C6AA90.8AAC20...pse.net... (...) Here's the million dollar qustion: how can the general public be competent enough to be an adequate judge of movie quality (or of political (...) (26 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | |
| |  | | Re: How to decide what art is worth (was Re: Extropianism —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) I would say that they are an adequate judge of both. They may spend their cash on each as they see fit. And they're wrong on both counts. --Chris (26 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| |  | | Re: How to decide what art is worth (was Re: Extropianism —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Because it's an opinion, and thus subject to polling (in the form of box office receipts), rather than proving or disproving (...) Ditto, although I'd say right now the system is rigged so the GP doesn't get a fair chance to say what they (...) (26 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |