 | | Re: The meaning of Christmas (was Re: Christmas Train update —Stephen Jacquot
|
| | | (...) Could you expand on that first sentence? If you meant to say that it is impossible to prove by logic the existence or nonexistence of gods, then many (1) theists would surely agree, but if you mean that it has been proven that gods do not or (...) (26 years ago, 15-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The meaning of Christmas (was Re: Christmas Train update —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I'm gonna retract this, it was said hastily. It's difficult to prove or disprove the existence of out of system things starting from within a system. But I'll say that I've personally satisfied myself of the implausability of the Christian (...) (26 years ago, 16-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The meaning of Christmas (was Re: Christmas Train update —Richard Dee
|
| | | | (...) Oh, I am quite satisfied he existed, just not as or in the fashion as described in the bible. Artistic license is possibly the best way to describe the acts and miracles with which he is attributed. The absence of him having been recorded by (...) (26 years ago, 16-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The meaning of Christmas (was Re: Christmas Train update —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | Richard Dee wrote: < Jesus existed.> Agreed. < Jesus was not the son of god.> Agreed. (26 years ago, 16-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
